Showing posts with label Crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Crime. Show all posts

Monday, June 6, 2016

A quantum of umbrage: Wait – Alberto Gonzales is still alive?

Seriously?

It seems like not that long ago that he was the former Bush AG (who made his bones reading death penalty appeals to the reading-disabled Governor of Texas and who later became famous for claiming "I don't remember" under oath more times than Ronald Reagan, who, unlike Gonzales, probably didn't), and who couldn't find work as a practicing lawyer because no law firm, now matter how sleazy and connected, would bring him on. After which, he had to struggle to find a publisher for his <airquotes>tell-all book</airquotes> about his good times with Dubya.

But now -- rumors to the contrary notwithstanding -- Alberto is back, to hump the leg of whoever's in charge now, with this offer that he's still for sale

As CNN’s Jake Tapper points out during the interview, Trump’s position is pretty much the epitome of racism. That, however, didn’t stop former George W. Bush administration Attorney General Alberto Gonzales from trying to defend Trump in a Washington Post op-ed published Saturday.

Gonzales’ argument rests on largely ignoring Trump’s own words and inventing new reasons for Trump’s objection that, even if true, seem irrelevant. He discusses Curiel’s affiliation with a San Diego-based Latino lawyers group and suggests that association might render him unable to render a fair judgment.

“If judges and the trials over which they preside are not perceived as being impartial, the public will quickly lose confidence in the rule of law upon which our nation is based,” Gonzales writes. “For this reason, ethics codes for judges — including the federal code of conduct governing Curiel — require not only that judges actually be impartial, but that they avoid even the ‘appearance of impropriety.'”

Monday, February 1, 2016

The unforgiving minute: Explaining the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge occupation in 51 words

First they locked themselves in and refused to come out.

Then they wanted someone to bring them snacks and got mad when it wasn't what they wanted..


These aren't "militiamen;" these are spoiled teenagers who hate their parents.




Minute's up.

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

A quantum of umbrage: What part of "shall make no law" is too complicated for you?


The Second Amendment may be a grammatical dog's breakfast, but the First Amendment couldn't be clearer if it was a buttonhook in the well water.

Which is what is so irritating about this:
The Post and Courier of Charleston reported Tuesday afternoon that state Rep. Mike Pitts (R) had introduced a bill called the “South Carolina Responsible Journalism Registry Law.” Reporter Gavin Jackson posted a summary of the bill — which includes “fines and criminal penalties for violation of the chapter” — on Twitter, but wrote that the full text was not yet available.
Naturally, if Rep. Pitts wanted to register only <airquotes> responsible </airquotes> gun owners, his political career would be over in a New York minute, so to speak.

Once again: Even First Amendment purists like me accept certain reasonable restrictions: Time, place, and manner; libel, slander, and perjury; false advertising; clear and present danger (once again, you Tom Clancy fanboys, a First Amendment trigger, not a Second). The First Amendment brought down Nixon. What has the Second Amendment done for us lately, except makes Starbucks and federal bird sanctuaries a safe haven for gun-totin', Constitution-misquotin'. self-deludin', snack-beggin' yahoos?

Meanwhile, back in the state that fired first on Fort Sumter, they're worrying that unregistered journalists are the existential threat to our nation, not the seditionists who are illegally bunked in at a federal bird sanctuary in Oregon -- and no one will make the latter face justice because they're armed to the teeth.

Coincidence? I think not.

I cite the p3 motto: May the First Amendment always triumph over the Second Amendment.

Sunday, January 10, 2016

Sunday morning toons: It may be time to put ridicule back in the toolbox for a bit

(Update: Apparently I had a "squirrel!" moment in the middle of the Ann Telnaes bit, below. It's fixed now.)

Two stories dominated the news, and the toons, this week (sorry, Donald! too bad for you, Saudi Arabia and Iraq! tough noogies, North Korea! count your blessings, Bill Cosby! lucky break, China! just go away, Roy Moore!): The bizarre attempt by the Bundy brothers and their followers to take over, and get snacks, in Burns, Oregon, and the Obama initiative to bring about widely popular and incredibly modest gun safety (we're still a long, long way from anything that could remotely be called "gun control") measures by executive order.

You'll see different angles on the Burns occupation. Some ridicule the militia guys, a group who could hardly have come less well-prepared if they were arriving at their first bar mitzvah.

Some went the obvious track of imagining how long and how peaceful the standoff would (not) have been if the occupiers had been black or Muslim. I don't find the point as compelling as some people do. If you're looking for a parallel, in which a town was occupied in defiance of the federal government and it did not turn out well, there's not much need for hypotheticals. Plus that easy argument misses the essential problem caused by the militia/posse commitatus movement of the last few decades, now on display in Burns: This is not about the overreach (or underreach) of law enforcement officials; the government's soft-hands reponse is shaped far more by Waco and Ruby Ridge than anything about Sanford, Ferguson, or Baltimore. Nor is it about the semantics of the "terrorism" label; we already have an adequate legal definition for what's going on there. This is about a cult of sedition, and a movement that's made little secret since its inception that its aim is to break the fundamental bonds that hold our system of government together. So, to get in under the wire here you had to bring something more to the discussion than just the obvious.

And, of course, some cartoonists looked forward to the wrath of the birders. And can you blame them?

As I'm writing this, the arrival of truckloads of armed reinforcements from Idaho have complicated the situation for the local authorities and the residents, and upped the danger factor considerably, which is probably going to make ridiculing the Bundys a less appropriate response in the days to come.

By comparison, the range of cartoon responses to Obama's gun safety seemed pretty constricted. Gun nuts and knee-jerk Obama contrarians. . . well, they hate it. Duh. And the executive orders themselves have just enough moving parts that many cartoonists, like many of the rest of us, found it easier to focus instead on Obama's leadership or the support of John Smith of Anytown, USA, or at most, the the gap in scale between Obama's gun safety measures and the epidemic of gun violence (to which the Burns occupation not unconnected) in the US.

Let's press ahead.

Today's toons were selected by a Committee on Toon Safety from the week's offerings at McClatchy DC, Cartoon Movement, Go Comics, Politico's Cartoon Gallery, Daryl Cagle's Political Cartoons, About.com, and other fine sources of cartoon goodness.


p3 Best of Show: Jeff Danziger.

p3 Legion of Merit (with feathers): Robert Ariail.

p3 Award for Best Adaptation from Another Medium: Matt Wuerker.

p3 Certificate of Harmonic Toon Convergence: Jerry Holbert, David Fitzsimmons, and Walt Handlesman.


Ann Telnaes looks back at the Charlie Hebdo shootings a year ago, and regrets that we haven't learned the most important lesson.

Mark Fiore celebrates the Patriots' Magna Carta. Some assembly required.


Tom Tomorrow looks forward to the future. From the past. Just go read it. You'll see. (Anachronism watch: A desktop computer like that wouldn't have been available yet in 1978. Has Dr. von Philbert already polluted the timeline?)

Keith Knight knows what's wrong with Tennessee.

Reuben Bolling says: Know your caliphates!

Red Meat's Ted Johnson and Mister Wally may have put Uber out of business.


The Comic Strip Curmudgeon marks the weekend of highly structured gender roles. Except for that last one, which creeped me out enough when I first read it, but thanks to the Curmudgeon it now creeps me out a little bit more.

Comic Strip of the Day salutes the paranoid and the uneducated.


Not even a mouse! As promised: "Million Dollar Cat," directed in 1944 by Joseph Hanna and William Barbera, is the MGM version of a similar story from Warner Bros in 1942 featuring an early Bugs and Elmer, which we featured here last week. (By comparison, this is the 14th Tom and Jerry short, and Tom's early look was mainly settled: he was Russian Blue of distinctly catlike appearance and movement. True, he was mostly walking upright on two feet by this point, but he hadn't become as heavily anthropomorphized as he would be under Hanna and Barbera's direction over the the next decade. Uncredited voice work by Harry E. Lang as Tom. (Lang isn't that well known today, but he did voice work for both MGM and Warner Bros animations in the 1940s, and of course true Langophiles remember his 1953 performance as the French waiter in "Abbot and Costello Go to Mars" – also, alas, uncredited. You can look it up.) Watch "Million Dollar Cat" on Vimeo.


The Right-Sized Oregon Toon Block:

Ex-Oregonian Jack Ohman gives the best lines to the deer – probably because it's the smaht one.

Possibly Ex-Oregonian Jen Sorensen got to this punchline first, and with the hashtag that should have dominated Twitter.

Matt Bors works the Whose Lives Matter? trope, and it's probably the best example of the genre this week.

If there's an honor higher than the p3 Award for Best Adaptation from Another Medium, then Jesse Springer just walked off with it.



Test your toon captioning superpowers at The New Yorker's weekly caption-the-cartoon contest. (Rules here.) And you can browse The New Yorker's cartoon gallery here.




Monday, January 4, 2016

A long-forgotten brush with Republican celebrity

Ànd, for good measure,  it distantly connects me to Peyton Manning's current embarrassment, which I believe to be a first for both of us.

Back in my salad days at Purdue, I worked on an election committee for two candidates for student body president and vice president. I strongly suspect I did it to make headway with some attractive coed also on the committee, although no particulars come to mind at this late date. It's just that I remember nothing about the experience now except these three disconnected bits: (1) the last name of the fellow at the top of the ticket is Italian for "chicken pox." (2) his running mate was Joanie SerVass, daughter of Beurt SerVass, then publisher of the Saturday Evening Post and at about the same time part of Nixon's entourage on his historic trip to Moscow, and (3) although they lost, as I recall there was rumor later that they got a mild slap on the wrist for nevertheless dropping three times the allowable maximum on campaign expenditures - a story that, if true, I always supposed was more than coincidentally related to  (2), above.

This all came to mind because of a puckish bit of connecting the dots that Charlie Pierce shared yesterday. I like to think my modest contribution around the margins of the story adds a little something extra.to an admittedly complicated tale.

Clearly, the woman I remember as Joanie hasn't let the grass grow under her feet in the intervening years. At the time, I was unaware of her father's larger and apparently somewhat more complex business interests. Callow young  Democrat at the only Big 10 school to go for Nixon in 1972 that I was, it didn't occur to me that owning the Post wouldn't be enough right there. (According to Google, she inherited the magazine from her father in 2014.)

Funny old world, huh?

My other favorite brush-with-Republican-celebrity story is, fittingly, a New Year's Eve story: Part One: and Part Two.

Thursday, December 17, 2015

Quote of the day: Did we learn nothing from Bernie Madoff?


Nothing terrible happens to you in this country if you shaft ordinary people. We saw that after the financial collapse. Shaft members of the investor class, however, and you really might face the law's wrath. Ordinary schmucks aren't full citizens. Want justice? Buy financial instruments. If you can't, tough luck -- the law doesn't care what happens to you.

- Steve M., explaining why repulsive Young-Tom-Cruise-wannabe Martin Shkreli was actually charged with a crime (just not for jacking up the price of a life-saving medicine he controlled simply because he could, but instead for defrauding investors in matters largely unrelated to his drug-pricing racket).

Update: Optional graphic accompaniment to this QOTD by Pat Bagley.

Friday, October 9, 2015

A quantum of umbrage: Drip . . . drip . . . drip . . .

It was eight days ago that the shooter opened fire at Umpqua Community College, down I-5 from where I'm sitting now.

Drip . . . drip . . . drip . . . 

This morning, I hadn't been up long when I read about the shooting at Northern Arizona University. It happened about 1:20am Pacific time.

Well, we made it over a week, I thought. That's better than our average for 2015. (I was wrong; there had been four mass shootings in the US – including three separate incidents in Baltimore – since the Umpqua CC incident last week. But we'll let my blissful ignorance pass for the moment.)

Then at or shortly after noon noon Pacific time today came a second shooting – the Texas Southern University announced the campus lockdown at 10:27am Central, making it roughly eleven hours after the first incident this morning.

Drip . . . drip . . . drip . . .

Jesus, I thought to myself, we can't even make it a full 24 hours without a shooting like this anymore. I expressed to a friend the dim hope that maybe the mass shooters in the US, like the rest of us, would be knocking off early on Friday afternoon, giving the 24-hour nobody-got-shot clock a break.

Nope. The campus-wide text alert for the third shooting today, this time at Jefferson Technical and Community College in Louisville KY, went out at 3:39pm Eastern – a little less than half an hour after the TSU lockdown.

Drip . . . drip . . . drip . . .

We don't need a 24-hour clock, I would have muttered into my drink, if I'd had one. We need an egg timer.

This is way we've chosen to live things in this country. We're not going to do anything about it. That's been clear for almost two years.
Yup. We're just going to let it happen. We feel terrible, and we waste no time Facebooking our thoughts and prayers, and we give the families and community time to mourn, and we probably create a new hashtag, and then . . . we reset the egg-timer and move on.

And, if we're gun fetishists and Obama-haters like the first-name-only dimwits in Roseburg today, we insist that even the merest hint of a suggestion of the possibility of considering it's finally time to consider initial steps to reigning in this disease is the very height of bad taste.

And if we're 2016 GOP presidential wannabes, we just want to change the subject.

Drip . . . drip . . . drip . . . 

Dead . . . dead . . . dead . . . 



Saturday, February 7, 2015

The unforgiving minute: In fairness to Mr. Williams

While he did tell what Huckleberry Finn called "a stretcher" regarding his time in Iraq in 2003, Brian Williams was a piker compared to the top eight members of the Bush Administration during the same time.

One wonders if any of them -- Dubya, Cheney, Condi, Rummy, or the rest -- considered taking themselves off the air for a few days.

One doubts it. One doubts it very seriously.

Williams only egged on, and surfed on, their crimes. He's a sad case -- albeit a sad case with magnificent hair -- but he's not the one who belongs in a cell in The Hague.

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Reading: Quid pro quo? Really?

I've finished Rick Perlstein's The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan, and if I thought the Nixonian beginning depressed and angered me (and it did), it got worse once the rise of Reagan was spelled out. 

(Ford, the actual sitting president between the two, comes off as a hapless fellow who would tack whatever direction the prevailing wind required, with little success. Perlstein uses the trope "damned if he does, damned if he doesn't" more than once to describe Ford's luckless efforts to navigate between the Charybdis of Watergate, Nixon's pardon, a continuing Soviet menace, and a tanking economy, on one side, and the Scilla of Reagan's telegenic refusal to admit that there was one single problem in America that optimism – plus a major rightward slant on the economy and foreign policy – couldn't fix, on the other.)

Perlstein's take on Reagan, and his attractiveness, is simple – like Reagan himself: He learned early in his not-terribly-happy childhood to recast his troubles as optimistic, heroic, counterfactual adventures – with himself as the hero, always mindful of how he looked to the crowd. Most of us recall his misrememberings of the iffy rescue stories from his years a lifeguard, or his stories while president of his Army career or the details of who died where in the WWII European Theater. But Perlstein documents a good number more of them, and they form a disturbing pattern.

Here's just one, from his days as the president of the Screen Actors Guild in the 1950s.

One month later he [Reagan, then president of the SAG] would deliver something else: A legal document, signed by him in his capacity as union president, granting MCA exclusive right to ignore a crucial Screen Actors Guild rule: a ban on agencies producing TV shows. It was a conflict of interest, because agents had the obligation to get their clients paid as much as possible, and producers had an interest in having them paid the least. But Lew Wasserman saw television as his next gold mine, and he wanted in.

There were 1,126 times more televisions in American homes than had been in 1942. Studio bosses feared the infernal machines like the plague (for a time Jack Warner banned them as set dressing in Warner Bros. Films). Hollywood actors came to fear them, too. "Thousands of hours of entertainment must be available to the television public," the Saturday Evening Post reported early in 1952, "and any guess as to where it will come from is as good as another." TV production was almost exclusively done in New York, live, instead of Los Angeles, where shows were shot on film. If TV shows were filmed, producers worried that actors would demand payment every time a show was rerun – what was known as a "reuse" payment; producers adamantly refused to even entertain the idea of reuse payments. In Los Angeles, these were perilous times: If actors held the line and continued to demand them, and movies continued to lose market share to TV, Hollywood as an institution might shrivel at an alarming rate.

Within this matrix, Wasserman spied a bonanza business opportunity.

He set up a TV production subsidiary in Los Angeles called Review – this was, on its face, against SAG rules. Wasserman, however, convinced his favorite client to sell the SAG on the idea of granting MCA a "blanket waiver" of that rule. Wasserman and his lawyer Laurence Beilenson sold the idea to Jack Dales by arguing that the acting game in Los Angeles would die without it – that TV production would stay in New York. But the argument didn't really make sense. For if letting one agency have a blanket waiver, as a monopoly, might open the floodgates to Hollywood TV production, wouldn't help Los Angeles all the more to let all agencies enjoy the same right?

It made more sense when you considered the sweetener MCA added to the deal: a secret quid pro quo. Revue would give SAG what the studios adamantly refused to grant: reuse fees.How secret was that part of the deal? It may have even been kept from Reagan, who seemed quite in earnest when, asked at a 1962 hearing on MCA's alleged monopoly power, said there was no quid pro quo. At that, a letter from Beilenson to Wasserman recollecting the secret terms – that Revue was willing to sign a contract giving the guild members reuse fees when no one else was willing to do so – was read out. Reagan was asked the question again. He replied, guilelessly, "It's quite conceivable then if he says it in this letter." By that time, Review was so gigantic that MCA had a direct hand in 45 percent of all network shows.

Maybe Reagan didn't know the deal was dirty. Maybe he just convinced himself of his friend and benefactor's incorruptible character. As usual, in those he believed innocent, innocence was all his eyes saw. It was his gift.

As a side bar, and something of a giggle, here's Reagan putting his thang down, street cred-wise, at the 1980 debate against Jimmy Carter and John Anderson:
But, if we're talking about how much we think about the working people and so forth, I'm the only fellow who ever ran for this job who was six times President of his own union and still has a lifetime membership in that union.
Reagan, who went from a Roosevelt Democrat to a studio stooge within a decade, sold out his SAG union while he still carried their card in his wallet, and once he was elected president he fed the union movement – famously starting with the air traffic controllers, after which his supporters showed their irony-free gratitude by naming an airport after him – into the shredder. And the unions believed him. They believed him. Go fig.

In any case, here's the lovable, avuncular, doddering old Dutch in 1987, near the end of his second term in the Oval Office, as the Iran Contra scandal was blowing up somewhere near his face. You'll see the pattern:

"A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and evidence tell me it is not."

His heart and his best intentions. Yeah. It's all of a piece. Remember that the next time you read someone celebrating the Age of Reagan, with that whole City-on-a-Hill Morning-in-America fantasy. What Reagan himself – and his loyalists a generation later – always liked most about him was his ability to have no clue about the shifty business happening right under his nose, let alone what he'd been party to in the past. He was the plucky hero, no matter what.

No wonder most people outside his inner circle couldn't tell simply by watching when Reagan's Alzheimer's finally set in.

Monday, December 1, 2014

Quote of the day: The rhetoric of the occupying power

(Updated below.)
This is the bold chest-thumping of the Vichy apparatchik. This is the pouter-pigeon flummery of every deputized yahoo in every tinhorn dictatorship. This is the mock-courage of the true subject of an occupying power.
- Charlie Pierce, on the pouting reaction of the St. Louis PD to the entrance on-field of members of the Rams last night, holding up their hands in the "hands up, don't shoot me!" position. The SLPD are actually indignant that the community they keep "safe" by arbitrary violence isn't sufficiently grateful.

Go for Pierce's righteous anger; stay for the scarcely-comforting background of the SLPD's spokesperson.


Update: Here's a nice bit of news: The St. Louis police don't have separate whites-only/blacks-only drinking fountains, but they do have their own advocacy organizations. Wonder why?

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Presented for your consideration

I'm delighted to see that this horrible excuse for a human being is getting his brush with justice.
More than four years after an underground explosion killed 29 mine workers, a federal grand jury Thursday indicted the top executive of the West Virginia coal company that ran the mine, charging him with fraud and conspiracy to violate safety laws.

Don Blankenship, who was CEO of Massey Energy, becomes the highest-ranking executive to face charges in the deadly blast at the Upper Big Branch Mine, the worst U.S. coal mining disaster in 40 years.

Blankenship is charged with conspiring to commit and cause willful violations of federal mine safety and health standards at the mine in Raleigh County, West Virginia.

Federal prosecutors allege that Blankenship also conspired to hinder and impede federal mine safety inspections to conceal safety violations that were committed routinely at the mine.

He also is charged with making false statements about the company's safety practices to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in the aftermath of the April 5, 2010 blast, and with securities fraud involving shares of Massey Energy.

According to the indictment, Blankenship knew there were hundreds of safety violations at the mine every year and could have stopped them: "Yet he fostered and participated in an understanding that perpetuated'' routine safety violations "in order to produce more coal, avoid the costs of following safety laws, and make more money."
Of course, it's 2014, which means that the more wealthy, powerful, and connected you are, the less likely you are ever to pay for your crimes, no matter how ugly they are.

Several people I know have suggested a proper disposition for this fellow's fate, all along similar lines. In one variation or another, it involves him getting the Rod Serling treatment.


Friday, September 12, 2014

In which two two celebrities of dubious achievement go for their Heisenberg moment

Two people, emotionally, morally, and intellectually unequipped for the gangsta life they've found themselves tossed into, but knowing they liked it just the same:

Exhibit 1:
George Zimmerman threatened to kill a driver during a road rage incident in Lake Mary and later showed up at the man's workplace, according to police.

The road rage incident happened Tuesday, Lake Mary police told Local 6, but the other driver declined to press charges, so Zimmerman was not arrested.

Police said the man, whose name was not released, called police after a truck pulled up next to him and the driver yelled, "Why are you pointing a finger at me?"

The man pulled into the Circle K at 4410 W. Lake Mary Blvd. to call 911, according to police, who added that driver followed him into the parking lot but took off before police arrived.

Police spokeswoman Bianca Gillett said the man recognized the truck driver as Zimmerman. The man said Zimmerman, who was carrying a gun, asked, "Do you know who I am?" before saying, "I'll (f***ing) kill you."
Exhibit 2:
The report of Sarah Palin's involvement in the second confrontation was based on a single anonymous source who spoke to Coyne. The source said the former Alaska governor was "nearly crawling on top of people" during the second melee in an attempt to get into the mix, all while screaming and shouting profanities.

Thompson told "Good Morning America" the ex-governor was yelling "Do you know who I am?" during the commotion, but he stopped short of saying she became physically involved in the fight.

(Emphasis added.)

Okay, kids, huddle up. This is how it's done: 


Monday, August 18, 2014

The unforgiving minute: Everybody gets pinched, but you did it right.

Steve M. at No More Mister Nice Blog is teasing out an interesting theory about the effects of his indictment on Texas Governor Rick Perry's presidential plans:
Incessantly trolling liberals was working for him. Tacking hard to the right on immigration was working for him. Being a martyr to evil liberalism might work for him, too.
Will indictment help Perry's chances in 2016 – at least in the GOP primaries?

I've recently begun to think that the Republican party, in its current form, has moved beyond win-at-any-cost; now even winning seems to lose some of its fizz for them unless they win dirty. Going there is no longer a tactical last resort; it's become both proof of one's willingness to play "hardball" against the enemy, and evidence that one buys into the post-Reagan ideology that government-created laws are part of the problem (or the post-Nixon article of faith that, if the President does it, it isn't illegal).

Both working historian Rick Perlstein and working journalist Charlie Pierce agree that there's a strain of Republicanism that judges its candidates by how underhanded – if not flat-out felonious – they're willing to get. Once that happens, something like Perry getting indicted for putting the screws to a Democratic-led ethics investigation of his own administration's shady doings becomes less of a political embarrassment to be covered over and more of a sacred rite of passage to be celebrated:


Perhaps we should change his nickname from "Governor Goodhair" to "Governor Goodfella." I like to think Molly Ivins would approve.

Sunday, August 10, 2014

Saturday Sunday morning afternoon tunes: Well, yeah, Watergate did bother us, and forty-years later, my conscience is doing just fine

Yesterday went seriously awry, so we're just now getting around to the weekend tune.

Forty years ago yesterday, one lie fed seamlessly into another: Richard Nixon, who told he was not a crook (but he was) resigned from office to escape impeachment and was replaced by Gerald Ford, who told us our long national nightmare was over (but it wasn't).

You can take your pick of I-Hate-Nixon songs from back in the day. Me, I think we don't get enough Zappa around here.


Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Good news everyone: It didn't end in bloodshed! This time!

(Update: Ridiculous misspelling in title fixed.)

When I saw the headline this morning – "Two Guys With Guns Have Showdown On First Day Of Georgia's New 'Guns Everywhere' Law" – I thought to myself, well, that didn't take long, did it?
A "misunderstanding" between two armed men in a Georgia convenience store led to an arrest on the very day that the state's new expansive gun rights law went into effect, according to The Valdosta Daily Times.

Valdosta Police Chief Brian Childress summed the incident up for the newspaper.

“Essentially, it involved one customer with a gun on his hip when a second customer entered with a gun on his hip," Childress said.

According to the Daily Times, the first man, Ronald Williams, approached the second man in the store and demanded to see his identification and firearms license. Williams also pulled his gun from his holster, without pointing it at the second man. The second man responded by saying that he was not obligated to show any permits or identification -- then he paid for his purchase, left the store, and called the police.

Police responded to the call around 3 p.m. Tuesday, and Williams was arrested on a charge of disorderly conduct for pulling his gun in the store.
But here's the thing: As I read this story, even though one of the guys drew his gun, neither of the two central figures, nor any nearby noncombatants, were injured. The reason why, as they say, may surprise you:

The unnamed fellow had a gun, but he didn't pull it. Instead he kept his cool, retreated (although I don't know if he'd use that word for getting out of the danger zone), and let the police handle it – and they did.

In other words, the fellow in the Georgia convenience store – whose name we do not know, I remind you – did the exact opposite of what George Zimmerman did that night in February 2012, whereupon the latter made himself famous.

Note that Georgia does have a so-called "Stand Your Ground" law, under which a person who feels threatened has no duty to retreat to safety but rather is allowed to open fire at the object of his concerns. That legal fact, combined with the fact that such encounters – which Georgia's "Gun Everywhere" law virtually guarantees will happen, a lot, in bars, strip clubs, sporting events, schools, and yes, convenience stores – means that the unnamed non-shooter would have had a legal defense available if he'd dived behind the beef jerky display and blasted away.

But he didn't. He retreated and called the police. And at least two persons in Georgia are alive this afternoon who might not have been otherwise.

Good news everyone.

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

A quantum of umbrage: Maybe honest wins are just no fun

While we're waiting on pins and needles (or torches and pitchforks) for the outcome of the Great Mississippi Senate Primary Do-Over, here's a question:

Is there a part of the modern conservatives' wiring that they can't even enjoy a victory unless there was some ratfucking involved?

The thought was planted by a story that historian Rick Perlstein has probably been dining out on, deservedly, for almost a decade:
The response to my address was, understandably, defensive. My co-panelist [long-time conservative activist and apologist] Stan Evans retorted that my invocation of Richard Nixon was inappropriate because Nixon had never been a genuine conservative. He added: "I didn't like Nixon until Watergate."
Warping ahead, that story came to mind a week or so ago when Charlie Pierce was gleefully watching Mississippi put the "Guignol" in the "Grand Old Party."
This is going to work. Honest to god, it is. Chris McDaniel, the Mississippi Tea Party cockfighting aficionado whose supporters have odd hobbies like videotaping people in the final stages of dementia and getting locked inside buildings where votes are stored, looks to have put some daylight between himself and longtime incumbent Thad Cochran. If this isn't the living proof of the maxim that all publicity is good publicity -- to say nothing of being the living definition of the political concept of "Mississippi" -- I don't know what is.
And now – ripped from today's headlines, as they say:
The [Milwaukee] Journal-Sentinel reported that 50-year-old Robert Monroe was caught as a result of an investigation into a possible illegal voting by his son in Waukesha County. But after his son denied requesting an absentee ballot from his father’s address in Shorewood, suspicion turned to Monroe.

A complaint claimed that Monroe voted five times in Gov. Scott Walker’s (R) recalled election. He also was accused of voting illegally in a 2011 Wisconsin Supreme Court election, a 2012 primary, and the 2012 presidential election.

Although the complaint did not state who Monroe voted for, WISN determined that he had donated money to Republican state Sen. Alberta Darling.

Prosecutors used Monroe’s cell phone records to prove that he traveled all the way to Indiana to cast a second vote in the 2012 presidential election. Prosecutors also tested some of the ballots for genetic material, and only found DNA belonging to Monroe. […]

Monroe faces 13 felony election fraud charges in all, including voting more than once, voting as a disqualified person, registering in more than one place, and providing false information to election officials. He could spend up to 18 months in prison, and pay a $10,000 fine for each charge.
Now, I suppose we might hope that True the Vote will parachute in to make sure that white middle-aged insurance executives don't abuse the franchise.

Or we could grab an egg timer to see how long it takes for conservatives to explain that flagrant right-wing voter fraud (with DNA evidence! Remember how they used to love DNA evidence?) is still somehow the fault of Democrats rather than a structural feature of modern conservatism? Oh, never mind; you can put the egg timer back.

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Quote of the day: Why is the Iraq War like using a CB radio?


No elite voice in this country seems capable of coming to terms with the fact that the Iraq war was "lost" the moment it was launched. It was lost because it was based on lies and deception. It was lost because it violated international law. What a pathetic narrative people like John McCain and Lindsey Graham regurgitate this late in the game: that things were "won" in Iraq by Bush the Younger and then "lost" by Obama with the US withdrawal. We lose IQ points even listening to that drivel.
- Joseph A. Palermo, winding up one of the best – of many, many, many – essays this week on why no one anywhere should be listening to the opinion of the Zombie Iraq Warhawks.

Palermo's piece is going on the p3 Readings list.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Oh, who's kidding whom?

Since the school shooting in Troutdale this morning, this image has started cropping up on my Facebook feed.

For a moment I considered shopping a version that said "There'll be more" – because of course there will be – and putting it up, but I wasn't in the mood to be pointlessly right at a moment like this.

So I'll just share this observation by Charlie Pierce:
"The ego of the disgruntled must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of students."
We live in a sick, sad country.

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Quote of the day: Therefore, Exceptional


[W]hat we are seeing, over and over again, is what happens when you combine the inebriate effect of American Exceptionalism in the philosophy of the law. Race does not exist as an issue in our country anymore because we have overcome it, because we are America and, therefore, Exceptional. Our elections are clean and honest, no matter how much money is sluicing through them, because we are America and, therefore, Exceptional. And if the people of a state wish to vote through a policy that deliberately harms racial minorities, they cannot be acting out of racial bigotry, because we are America, and race does not exist as an issue in our country any more because we are Execptional. And if the success of this policy at the polls is guaranteed because of the money that powers its passage, then the money cannot have been a factor because our elections are clean and honest because we are America and, therefore, Exceptional.
- Charlie Pierce, leading a tour of the various amusement rides at the theme park inside Justice Anthony Kennedy's head.

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

A quantum of umbrage: If they look our way, everybody say "moo!" and act casual


It's otherwise not a story with much good about it, but I find it darkly amusing that armed supporters of welfare cowboy Cliven Bundy (lost brother, perhaps, to Ted and Al) showed up in his defense wearing camouflage.

These are crazy, dangerous people, but here's the image that keeps coming to mind: