From letters to the editor in last weekend's Sunday Oregonian (I know, I know -- but I absolutely have to have a newspaper of some kind to read with Sunday breakfast):
Thursday's article in The Oregonian ("Library seeks permanent 'yes' vote," Oct. 18) quotes the president of the libertarian Cascade Policy Institute, who says that libraries need "to have a conversation about who their clients are, how to do business, and about how to reduce costs by contracting out various functions." This language of profit-making misses the point.Of course, the very next letter following Le Guin's at the site begins with this sentence: “I'm against all ballot measures that will raise property taxes.” So some people just have a better handle on the idea of “commonwealth” than others.
A great library like ours is a huge operation, run by people with first-class management and business skills who know the people they serve and how to keep expenses to a minimum -- but it's not a business. It's a public service and a public trust. As a storehouse of information, knowledge and art, open to all, it serves the whole county community, and so it's rightly supported by the community.
The present ballot measure setting up a tax district is a long-overdue effort to take the onus of endlessly voting on levies off the citizens by giving the library a stable, adequate income.
A "no" vote will send us back to years of financial instability. A "yes" vote will keep the library doors open -- open to all, every day.
URSULA K. Le GUIN
Northwest Portland
Meanwhile, if you haven't yet voted (I have), and you're registered to vote in Multnomah County (I'm not), support Measure 26-143.
No comments:
Post a Comment