In particular, Wolcott gives a good thrashing to the truism that the right wing always preferred a fight with Hillary to a fight with Obama.
I believe that they're far more wary of the Clinton machine than the Obama phenomenon because a phenomenon can be pricked or pop of its own accord, leaving behind a melting iridescence, whereas a machine like Clinton's feeds on the negativity thrown at it, a juggernaut nightmare […]
Read the whole thing. It's going on the Reading list on the sidebar.
1 comment:
I think Chris Matthews has it about right. He says that Obama is high risk-high reward. He could get 55%. He could get 45%. Hillary, on the other hand, you're looking at 50.1%-49.9%, a white knuckler, all the way.
Post a Comment