Now, I suspected all along--and TJ has since confirmed--that when he said "go nowhere" he didn't actually mean specifically, well . . . nowhere. He just meant it in the unremarkable sense that, like virtually all Democratic initiatives in Congress these days, it almost certainly won't get passed and might not even get a debate or vote.
Nevertheless:
Having just gotten off the phone with the offices of my two Senators (and Feingold's office), I'm of the opinion that wherever the censure motion is going--and always assuming it has virtually no chance of actual passage--it still ain't going <air quotes>nowhere</air quotes>.
Here's a partial rundown of the good that Feingold's censure motion will likely do:
- It will embarrass the GOP to have to waste a little more of their dwindling supply of political and PR capital swatting it down.
- It will achieve a certain amount of consciousness-raising among Feingold's timid Democratic colleagues to the extent that it excites any active response among voters.
- It will interrupt the already scant coverage of Bush's latest round of speeches on Iraq (offered in lieu of an actual plan for Iraq).
- It will plant the seed in some confused or scandal-numbed voters that a consequential response to Bush's illegal adventures is both possible and thinkable.
- It will contribute to the public perception that Feingold may well be presidential timber, and is certainly worth at least a look come primary time.
I left a message at Feingold's office (DC: 202-224-5323) thanking him for introducing the censure motion.
And it all only took about 3 minutes. If you need to find your senator's local or DC number, or you're the type who likes to have talking points in front of you before you dial, go here.
(Update: The GOP counter-maneuvering has begun; see FDL's update.)
2 comments:
feingold is a dolt. no matter how much mud is slung the dems will not be in the white house come 2008. the country is not that apathetic.
Hey, Pirate:
I suppose people can disagree in good faith about Feingold. I'm not at all sure he's electable [or even nominatable], although he's no dolt.
But to think that the censure-related charges against Bush are simply "mud" is to live in a dream world.
Thanks for stopping by, though.
bn
Post a Comment