Monday, March 20, 2006

The Great Education Myth

A couple of weeks ago, Paul Krugman laid out the numbers showing that the widening earnings gap in the last three decades was produced by the increased concentration of wealth and power in America--not by education, whose power to raise earnings has, contrary to popular myth, flatlined during that period.

David Sirota takes it to the next level, pointing out that those two hotbeds of class war and worker unrest--Fortune Magazine and the Federal Reserve--have demonstrated why college educated workers in the "knowledge business" are at greatest economic risk from so-called "free trade" policies: because their work, unlike, say, construction, is most easily outsourced to low-wage countries in Asia.

Sirota brings it home:
America's sell-out "free" trade policy is now not just a problem for manufacturing workers - its a problem for information-sector workers. This trade policy, in the name of larger and larger corporate profits going to smaller and smaller numbers of people, is now undermining the value of education. And now matter how many pundits, politicians or elites say the word "education" over and over again, the data shows they are pushing a myth.
In the American mythos, education has been the egalitarian ladder that will allow anyone to get ahead. "Free trade" fetishists are pulling that ladder up behind them, and don't really care about the consequences.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

College educated workers? Oh you mean the ones who readily recommend that their companies send manufacturing and customer service jobs overseas in order to cut costs and I might add earn a healthy bonus for themselves? Hmmm....interesting.

I guess it really is a dod eat dog world huh?

Nothstine said...

Hey, Shawn--

I was thinking more of the college educated workers just under the guys who get to decide to outsource the work to India and China. But yeah, when it was the people who were putting circuit boards and cross-trainers together whose jobs went away, those just-under guys thought that outsourcing was just one of those tough darwinian facts of life. [They probably voted against unionizing, too, since they identified more with the guys working above them than with the guys working below them.]

But now those jobs that those mid-level "knowledge-worker" guys had are realizing they're the next ones in line to be jobbed out to Katmandu, and so they're suddenly discovering their interests may not be exactly where they thought they were.

Interesting times. [Isn't that from an old Chinese curse? Probably one of the first historical instances of outsourcing to Asia.]

bn