Sunday, January 15, 2006

Happy birthday

"You may well ask: 'Why direct action? Why sit-ins, marches, etc.? Isn't negotiation a better path?' You are exactly right in your call for negotiation. Indeed, this is the purpose of direct action. Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and establish such creative tension that a community that has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored. I just referred to the creation of tension as a part of the work of the nonviolent resister. This may sound rather shocking. But I must confess that I am not afraid of the word tension. I have earnestly worked and preached against violent tension, but there is a type of constructive nonviolent tension that is necessary for growth. Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal, we must see the need of having nonviolent gadflies to create the kind of tension in society that will help men to rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood. So the purpose of the direct action is to create a situation so crisis-packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation. We, therefore, concur with you in your call for negotiation. Too long has our beloved Southland been bogged down in the tragic attempt to live in monologue rather than dialogue."
Rev. Martin Luther King, "Letter from Birmingham Jail"

2 comments:

The Rambling Taoist said...

We need a presence like MLK, now more than ever.

Nothstine said...

I agree. His capacity to take risks--with his own safety as well as his reputation--seem almost unbelievable today.

Same with his ability to articulate and rally people around ideas too complicated to fit on a bumper-sticker. Can you imagine a political or religious leader today producing a piece of writing like King's "Letter"? One that reached a broad general audience with a nuanced philosophical argument like this? One that would be studied in classrooms--as history, and as art--half a century later?

bn